Right here’s what it is advisable to know
- Haugen’s name for regulation of Fb was expansive and bold. She requested lawmakers to “escape of earlier regulatory frames.” She warned lawmakers that among the most generally debated proposals, together with privateness protections or tweaks to Part 230, a decades-old legislation that protects firms from lawsuits over what customers put up, could be inadequate.
- Lawmakers have publicly known as for regulation of social media for years however have did not move bipartisan proposals that will power higher transparency of social media giants. Tuesday’s listening to crystallized that whereas lawmakers are collectively outraged over Haugen’s allegations, there’s little consensus about precisely what sort of laws they should advance.
- Haugen’s leaks in regards to the firms are wide-ranging, and he or she raised issues in a “60 Minutes” interview about Fb’s determination to disband its civic integrity staff within the aftermath of the 2020 election forward of the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol. She has additionally raised issues in regards to the unfold of misinformation on Fb, significantly in non-English-speaking nations the place the corporate has not invested as a lot in content material moderation.
- Fb has sought to downplay Haugen’s testimony, tweeting throughout the listening to that she didn’t work immediately on among the matters she described. Fb CEO Mark Zuckerberg and chief working officer Sheryl Sandberg haven’t publicly commented on the revelations, which have plunged the corporate into public scandal in current weeks.